But if we do get through all that, "
The Middle Managers of Murder Introduction Bureaucracy is not unique to Germany, however its application by the National Socialists as a tool of totalitarian oppression is peerless. The rapid rearmament of Germany and mobilization for war required that the Nazi regime make use of the existing administrative machinery [ 1 ].
The German quest for Lebensraum living space meant more than defeating external enemies as would be the case in a traditional war. A racially pure Germany was the other half of the Lebensraum equation and to this end the Nazis relied on the knowledge and expertise of the Weimar era bureaucrats to execute genocide.
At first glance, Herz appears to be warning of the dangers of leaving the bureaucratic institutions of the German Democratic Republic GDR in place and unexamined in a reunited Germany, but Herz was writing inless than a year after the end of hostilities in the European theater in World War II.
The German bureaucracy inherited by Hitler was generally compliant with Personal perception of organized crime essay Nazi policies if not eager accomplices.
Herz compares the situation in the aftermath of World War II to the demise of the Weimar republic, but there is a longer history.
There is continuity from the bureaucracies of Bismarck, through the Weimar Republic, to the Nazi era, and into post-War Germany. Today, the legacy continues in the form of investigations into the possible Stasi involvement on the part of contemporary civil servants.
Origins of German Bureaucracy Ordered society would not be possible without bureaucracies to ensure the proper functioning of modern institutions such as hospitals, police, education, and the military. Bureaucracy predates the modern era, of course, but it was not until the late 18th and early 19th centuries that bureaucracy as we currently understand it was established.
The civil service in Germany dates back to the middle ages when commoners and lesser nobles were appointed civil servants who served at the leisure of the sovereign rather than an intermediary nobleman as was typical of feudal societies. These appointments were little different from ennoblement, and barely resembled the functionaries of a modern bureaucratic institution.
There was little in the way of a uniformed discipline. For one thing, appointments were made with scant regard to the merit of the individual being appointed--nepotism and favoritism were the rule. Even in medieval times, however, the irregular and inefficient bureaucracies focused the power of the sovereign.
Through delegation of office, consolidation of knowledge--and therefore power--was the result. The imposition of a rigid hierarchy ensured that rulers had direct insight into the happenings of everything within their domain.
Michel Foucault states that "Discipline [ The modern nation state required a new mode of power that was capable of managing the increasingly complex task of disciplining society.
Furthermore, mass production and rationalization of the economy also required more complex management processes.
The old feudal society was not equipped for the industrial revolution and mass production. Remnants of feudal society persisted, but the role of the nobility diminished as professional bureaucrats assumed greater control over the administration of the military, hospitals, police, and the market economy.
The ascendancy of disciplines in governance and bureaucratic institutions can be seen as a profound shift in how power was wielded. Rather than "deploy the ostentatious signs of sovereignty" in taming the populace, power "is manifested through the brilliance of those who exercise it.
This was costly in a political and economic sense, and more importantly was insufficient to the task. One of the primary roles of the modern bureaucrat is to classify and identify individual members of society so that they may be better managed.
In a very real sense, knowledge for the bureaucrat is power--power that was once wielded exclusively by the sovereign. Max Weber argued that bureaucracies were more developed in Germany than in France, England, or America in the 19th century.
The pre-Napoleonic Prussian military had more in common with medieval feudalism than modern bureaucracy.
However, one element of modern bureaucracy found in the Prussian military was professionalism and dedication to the institution in addition to or beyond any other loyalties. The sense that the Army as an organization, and not just the sovereign or government it served, was worthy of fealty was a characteristic to which the modern bureaucracy aspired.
In this sense, the rules, structure, hierarchy, duty and other abstract notions all became the mission of the solider or the bureaucrat.
This dual loyalty--to the institution as well as the nation or regime--would later be recognized by the National Socialists. As mentioned above, the Nazi party had to accept this fact if it was to expedite its struggle for power and its subsequent war effort.
The organizational technique of large armies was requisite to the formation of bureaucracy in Germany and elsewhere. Init was possible for Henry V to visit with individual members of his army, even those of the lowest rank, the night before the battle at Agincourt.
Certainly, he knew every officer no matter how junior. On the field of battle, most if not all of his men could see the king. His orders could be issued via verbal commands, and heard and relayed quickly across the short distance of the battle field the French and English lines were only yards apart.
Perhaps most importantly, the English king could see the entire field of battle and act accordingly.Organized CrimeMy personal perception of organized crime before this class is that it is a term used to describe the crimes that are committed by major criminal organizations like the mafia or leslutinsduphoenix.com://leslutinsduphoenix.com Why are Jews hated by so many people?
Why are so many people anti-Semitic? How and why did anti-Semitism start? Is there a solution to anti-Semitism? In the current essay we will discuss the fact that poverty causes crime. Poverty is a characteristic of the economic situation of the individual.
· PERSONAL PERCEPTION OF 1 Personal Perception of Organized Crime Paper Ana Christopherson CJA Bryan Kaminski November 16, PERSONAL PERCEPTION OF 2 Personal Perception of Organized Crime “Organized crime is a non-ideological enterprise involving a number of persons in close social interaction, organized on a hierarchical basis, with at leslutinsduphoenix.com Individual who are organized in their personal lives are more likely to be organized and efficient in their work topographic point.
An organized head establishes efficiency in all countries of life. They create an organized work environment which leads to overall organisational leslutinsduphoenix.com://leslutinsduphoenix.com Perception Case. The fact that perception is both an active and passive process suggests that perceptions may not always be accurate.
Not only may different people perceive the same object slightly differently, the same person may perceive the same object slightly leslutinsduphoenix.com+vs+perspective/.